In 2020 the election in GA was an illegal election based on a Judges approval of rule changes to voting requirements. Said violators should have been charged with the federal statute 5 U.S.C. 7311 for alteration of the form of government without an amendment.
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”
This is the OATH OF OFFICE, but there is a lot more to it that this simple statement when verbally taking the oath.
There are four (4) parts to regarding the oath, 5 U.S.C. 3331 is the actual verbal oath. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires participants taking the oath to sign an affidavit that they will not violate that oath during their tenure as defined by the third part 5 U.S.C. 7311 which makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of the oath of office) for anyone to “advocate the overthrow of our constitution form of government”.
Further, Executive Order 10450 defines the word “ADVOCATE” supplements 5 U.S.C. 7311 for any person taking the oath of office to ADVOCATE “the alteration of the form of the government of the United states by Unconstitutional means.” Thus, according to Executive Order 10450 (and therefore 5 U.S. 7311) any act taken by government officials who have taken the oath of office prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3331 which alters the form of government other by amendment, is a criminal violation of the 5 U.S.C. 7311.
Read that bold italic type again. Do you understand that statement? This includes the following (Article VI P:2) This Constitution, and the laws of the United States…shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution
In the federal lawsuit Walker v Members of Congress (a public record) the single intent was to compel Congress to obey the law of the Constitution and call an Article V Convention as peremptorily required by that law, the original intent of which has never altered by constitutional amendment. The lawsuit was brought because Congress has refused to obey the law of the Constitution. Such refusal obviously establishes the objective of the members of Congress to overthrow our form of government by establishing they (the members of Congress) can disobey the law of the Constitution and thus overthrow our constitutional form of government.
Therefore, by allowing a Judge to allow or approve or even to hear the case to allow changes to the voting rules and processes violates the states constitution and Article I of the US Constitution and said Judges and all who fail to stop said violation should be charged for violation of their oath of office. The case below states it plainly.
It is impossible for a law which violates the Constitution to be valid. Stated pointedly in Marbury vs. Madison, “All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Branch) 137, 174, 176, (1803).